Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dagan Fruchtman vs S. Cisse-Ignatiev

Mika Dagan Fruchtman
ISR
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
19
-
Height
-
894
C. Rank
0
771
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
19
-
Height
-
894
C. Rank
0
771
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Fruchtman 1 - 0 Cisse-Ignatiev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mika Dagan Fruchtman winning 2 and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev winning 0. The last match between Mika Dagan Fruchtman and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev was at the W15 Naples, 08-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fruchtman | 1 |
| Cisse-Ignatiev | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Naples(03-08-22)
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
6
6
Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev
4
0
M. D. Fruchtman vs S. Cisse-Ignatiev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.00% (53-53) | Career Total W/L | 0.00% (0-7) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. D. Fruchtman vs S. Cisse-Ignatiev Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mika Dagan Fruchtman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mika Dagan Fruchtman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mika Dagan Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/41). Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 0/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/7).
- Player level: In the last year, Mika Dagan Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mika Dagan Fruchtman winning 1 times and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mika Dagan Fruchtman winning 2 and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev winning 0.
- The last match between Mika Dagan Fruchtman and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev was at the W15 Naples, 08-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mika Dagan Fruchtman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mika Dagan Fruchtman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mika Dagan Fruchtman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Sophia Cisse-Ignatiev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. D. Fruchtman vs S. Cisse-Ignatiev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:32:0 | Average Match Time | 1:32:0 |
| 69% (31/45) | 1st Serve % | 63% (41/65) |
| 65% (20/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (19/41) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (37/65) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Fruchtman 0%, Cisse-Ignatiev 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fruchtman 0%, Cisse-Ignatiev 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fruchtman 0%, Cisse-Ignatiev 0%.
M. D. Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(8) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
S. Cisse-Ignatiev Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||

M. D. Fruchtman vs S. Cisse-Ignatiev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (53/53) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/7) |
| 49.37% (118/121) | Sets Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/14) |
| 49.75% (1104/1115) | Games Win/Loss | 25.64% (30/87) |
| 47.44% (37/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (16/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/7) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 52 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 456 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:19:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 402.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 666.57 |
| 65% (3411/5254) | 1st Serve % | 62% (139/226) |
| 58% (1970/3411) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (70/139) |
| 40% (728/1841) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (38/87) |
| 46% (316/684) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 47% (2538/5442) | Return Points Win % | 35% (75/216) |
| 48.15% (26/28) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 51.92% (27/25) | Futures W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50% (52/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/7) |
| 46% (6/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (14/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (51/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 12% (51/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 13% (55/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 1-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal